A Vision To Clear Solutions.
1.
Determine the mean target strength ft from the specified characteristic
compressive strength at 28-day fck and
the level of quality control.ft =
fck + 1.65 S , where S
is the standard deviation obtained from the Table of approximate contents given
after the design mix.
2. Obtain the water cement
ratio for the desired mean target using the emperical relationship between
compressive strength and water cement ratio so chosen is checked against the limiting
water cement ratio. The water cement ratio so chosen is checked against the
limiting water cement ratio for the requirements of durability given in table
and adopts the lower of the two values.
3. Estimate the amount of
entrapped air for maximum nominal size of the aggregate from the table.
4. Select the water content,
for the required workability and maximum size of aggregates (for aggregates in
saturated surface dry condition) from table.
5. Determine the percentage of
fine aggregate in total aggregate by absolute volume from table for the
concrete using crushed coarse aggregate.
6. Adjust the values of water
content and percentage of sand as provided in the table for any difference in
workability, water cement ratio, grading of fine aggregate and for rounded
aggregate the values are given in table.
7. Calculate the cement content
form the water-cement ratio and the final water content as arrived after
adjustment. Check the cement against the minimum cement content from the
requirements of the durability, and greater of the two values is adopted.
8. From the quantities of water
and cement per unit volume of concrete and the percentage of sand already
determined in steps 6 and 7 above, calculate the content of coarse and fine
aggregates per unit volume of concrete from the following relations:
where V
= absolute volume of concrete= gross volume (1m3) minus the volume
of entrapped air
W = Mass of water per cubic
metre of concrete, kg
C = mass of cement per cubic
metre of concrete, kg
p = ratio of fine aggregate to
total aggregate by absolute volume
fa,
Ca = total masses of
fine and coarse aggregates, per cubic metre of concrete, respectively, kg, and
Sfa,
Sca = specific
gravities of saturated surface dry fine and coarse aggregates, respectively
9. Determine the concrete mix
proportions for the first trial mix.
10. Prepare the concrete using
the calculated proportions and cast three cubes of 150 mm size and test them
wet after 28-days moist curing and check for the strength.
11. Prepare trial mixes with
suitable adjustments till the final mix proportions are arrived at.
I. MIX DESIGN OF CONCRETE AS PER IS: 10262.
Step 1:
Design Stipulations
Table –
1
Grade of concrete
|
M 20
|
M25
|
M30
|
M35
|
Type of Cement
|
OPC/53 Grade
|
OPC/53 Grade
|
OPC/53 Grade
|
OPC/53 Grade
|
Maximum size of aggregate.
|
30mm
|
30mm
|
30mm
|
30mm
|
Degree of workability.
|
0.8
|
0.90
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
Water Cement Ratio
|
0.5
|
0.45
|
0.42
|
0.4
|
Cement Content kg/m3
|
400
|
400
|
400
|
400
|
Aggregate Cement ratio
|
4.3
|
4.8
|
4.8
|
4.9
|
Step 2: Test Data For Materials
Table – 2
Cement Used
|
OPC/53
|
|
Sp. Gravity of Cement
|
3.15
|
|
Sp. Gravity of 30mm Aggregate
|
2.8
|
|
Sp. Gravity of 10mm Aggregate
|
2.76
|
|
Sp. Gravity of Grit Aggregate
|
2.82
|
|
Sp. Gravity of Crush sand Aggregate
|
2.79
|
|
Chemical
admixture @0.05% by wt. of cement
|
Superplasticizer
as per IS:1093
|
|
Water Absorption (%)
|
30mm Aggregate
|
1.10
|
10mm Aggregate
|
1.42
|
|
Grit Aggregate
|
3.06
|
|
Crush Sand Aggregate
|
2.80
|
Step 3:
Sieve Analysis
Table – 3
I.S. SIEVE
|
COARSE AGGREGATE
|
FINE AGGREGATE
|
||
|
CA II
% Passing
|
CA I
% Passing
|
Grit
% Passing
|
Crush Sand
% Passing
|
40mm
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
20mm
|
29.51
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
10mm
|
0.00
|
66.04
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
4.75mm
|
0.00
|
5.93
|
94.60
|
76.80
|
2.36mm
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
81.80
|
44.20
|
1.18mm
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
55.00
|
32.00
|
600 µ
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
28.80
|
15.60
|
300 µ
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
14.40
|
6.40
|
150µ
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
5.20
|
2.40
|
Fineness Modulus
|
7.70
|
6.26
|
3.2
|
4.23
|
Step 4:
Target Strength Of Concrete
Table – 4
Grade
of concrete
|
M20
|
M25
|
M30
|
M35
|
|
Target
strength (N/mm2)
|
Fck + 1.65 S
|
26.60
|
28.25
|
38.25
|
43.25
|
Characteristic
compressive strength (N/mm2)
|
3
days
|
12
|
16
|
21
|
23
|
7
days
|
16
|
20
|
24
|
28
|
|
28
days
|
20
|
25
|
30
|
35
|
Step 5:
Selection Of Water- Cement Ratio
Grade
of concrete
|
M20
|
M25
|
M30
|
M35
|
Water-Cement
Ratio
|
0.5
|
0.45
|
0.42
|
0.4
|
Step
6:Proportion Of Fine Aggregate and Coarse Aggregates
Table – 6
Cement
|
Grit
|
Crush Sand
|
Metal II
|
Metal I
|
…
|
21
|
21
|
33
|
25
|
Step 7:Mix Proportions for One
Cum of Concrete (SSD Condition)
Table – 7
Grade of concrete
|
M20
|
M25
|
M30
|
M35
|
Mass of Cement in kg/m3
|
400
|
400
|
400
|
400
|
Mass of Water in kg/m3
|
200
|
180
|
168
|
160
|
Mass of Fine Aggregate in kg/m3
|
614
|
684
|
696
|
704
|
Mass of grit in kg/m3
|
307
|
342
|
348
|
352
|
Mass of crushed sand in kg/m3
|
307
|
342
|
348
|
352
|
Mass of Coarse Aggregate in kg/m3
|
1429
|
1478
|
1295
|
1271
|
Mass of 20 mm in kg/m3
|
858
|
887
|
777
|
763
|
Mass of 10 mm in kg/m3
|
572
|
591
|
518
|
508.4
|
Mass of Admixture in kg/m3
|
Nil
|
Nil
|
2
|
2
|
Step 8:
Mix Proportions
Table – 8
Grade of concrete
|
M20
|
M25
|
M30
|
M35
|
Cement
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Water
|
0.5
|
0.45
|
0.42
|
0.4
|
Fine aggregate
|
1.53
|
1.71
|
1.75
|
1.76
|
Coarse aggregate
|
3.57
|
3.7
|
3.24
|
3.18
|
Conclusion
The results of mix design
indicate that crushed sand can also make as good a concrete as that made of
natural sand.The compressive strength obtained is same as of normal mixes.In
fact use of crushed sand will become inevitable in near future because of dwindling
sources of natural sand. Crushed sand particle though shaped, does not have the
spherical shape of natural sand. Hence the crushed sand will have greater water
demand than that of natural sand resulting in slightly higher cement
consumption. However, if crushed sand is properly graded with adequate fines
the mix may have lower water demand when compared to poorly graded natural
sand. Besides crushed sand can afford better control on gradation when compared
to natural sand. Hence crushed sand may become an economical option if good
quality natural sand is not available.
No comments:
Post a Comment